Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free:

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site:, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Google Analytics

Targeted advertising cookies


The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at or by post at:

24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal UMR BAGAP Temporary logo for l'institut Agro / Agrocampus Ouest Logo ESA

BAGAP research unit

Smaller fields and diversified crops can help spontaneous plants to make a comeback, even in the middle of fields

Increasing the length of field borders
© Air Papillon
Scientists from INRAE (Audre Alignier, Colette Bertand and Jacques Baudry fromt the BAGAP unit) and the CNRS, working with colleagues from Germany, Spain, the UK and Canada, have been looking at how crop diversity and field-border length (smaller fields have proportionately longer borders) can enrich plant species in farmland. Their study, published in the Journal of Applied Ecology and based on findings from 1,451 agricultural sites, shows that increasing field border lengths could be a highly effective measure to complement agri-environmental schemes, maintaining and restoring plant diversity right to the centre of fields.

Farmland now contains fewer species of spontaneous plants than even thirty years ago and they have also sharply declined in number. Often considered a nuisance by farmers, spontaneous plants in fields (more commonly known as weeds), act as an essential link in the biodiversity network, offering food and shelter to many different animals such as pollinators, birds and insects that assist crop growth.

One way to reduce the decline of these plants is to increase the proportion of semi-natural elements in the landscape (such as hedgerows and grassy strips). But this also reduces the area available for agricultural production and requires changes in both practice and perceptions that are sometimes not easy for farmers to make. A research team has therefore been looking for alternative levers, with a particular focus on heterogeneity in the crop mosaic, whether this takes the form of crop diversity, more field borders, or both.

As part of the European FarmLand projectinvolving 30 laboratories across Europe and Canada, researchers compared plant diversity levels in 1,451 1km2 farmed study sites, across 432 different agricultural landscapes, where the total length of field borders, crop diversity and the proportion of semi-natural elements were independently variable. A total of 899 plant species were identified.

The researchers demonstrated that longer field borders in agricultural landscapes enhance spontaneous plant diversity in the study sites, including those with no semi-natural features between the fields. This positive  effect was even more noticeable at the centres of the fields, where the number of spontaneous plants is usually lower than at the edges. The team also showed that longer field borders and crop diversity have different and complementary roles to play. For example, increasing the former leads to greater plant diversity on grassland, while increasing the latter leads to a greater diversity of plants in crops.

This suggests that altering field shapes to increase field border lengths in agricultural landscapes and increasing crop diversity would support high plant diversity right to the centre of the fields and would thereby generate a range of associated ecosystem services. In addition, other studies have shown that there is no significant reduction in yields for smaller fields. These measures might thus constitute a substantial (and much underexploited) lever to support both biodiversity and yields in farmland.

See also

The press release from INRAE

The Farmland project website